Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are guided via the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. 9. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking while in the present case. In this sort of circumstances, this petition is found to be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal for the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to really make it acceptable to the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified through the decision with the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” will not be binding, but may very well be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance to the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

These past decisions are called "case legislation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "Allow the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to this kind of past decisions, drawing on established judicial authority to formulate their positions.

The recent amendment to Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the regulation with contemporary challenges.

Free case regulation sites in Pakistan are a must have resources for any person needing to understand Pakistani regulation. By using the ideas and techniques outlined in this article, you are able to navigate these resources effectively and conduct complete legal research.

In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 in the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm to the person causes death of these kinds of person, possibly by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”

Section 302 of the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be topic for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.

Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and also case law at both the federal and state levels.

                                                                  

this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to notify the promotion on the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

                                                        

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and potential hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, even though observing the general development supports that electromagnetic more info fields have destructive effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should undertake the precautionary principle set out during the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The dearth of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.